This is the second attempt at the Acoma Indian Woman. This is the initial loose drawing
This is stage one initially painting the face.
Acoma Indian Woman 18" x 14" Waterford Not
Photographed 29/06 using My Nikon DSLR with 55mm lens. This is more accurate.
The more I looked at the first painting the more I realised how poor it was. This is my second attempt and while not perfect feel it is better. Colours used for the face were Cad Red Light (PR108) and Cad Yellow Light (PY35) together with Cerulean (PB35-W and N), Ultramarine (PB29) and Cobalt Blue (PB72) both Rowney. For the headdress I utilized Cerulean, Ultramarine Blue and Ultramarine Violet (PB15-Rowney) with some Viridian (PG18),. The hair was Quinacridone Gold (PO48) and Raw Sienna (Pbr7) both Maimeri. Also touches of Burnt Umber here and there with some Cadmium Orange (Maimeri PO20) to warm it up. I think the painting is actually better than the representation in the photograph. I once again add the disclaimer that I am not claiming this a great watercolour, just my watercolour. I studied several of Charles Reid's paintings before deciding how to tackle it. Looking at it I decided not to overdo the darks and only used the original photo as a guide..
Footnote Added 29/06: Looking at this photograph and then the original painting it seems it looks somewhat lighter and possibly `washed out' compared to the actual painting. My ad hoc photography is probably responsible. I have now made another attempt to photograph the painting and the result is above.
Footnote Added 29/06: Looking at this photograph and then the original painting it seems it looks somewhat lighter and possibly `washed out' compared to the actual painting. My ad hoc photography is probably responsible. I have now made another attempt to photograph the painting and the result is above.
What an improvement Peter, better drawing and far better indication of light make this a much more pleasing picture. Well done.
ReplyDeleteIt is better Mick (thanks) even if I say so myself! However have a look at the second photograph. It is closer to the original.
ReplyDeletehi, new to the site, thanks.
ReplyDelete